Nested switch collapsing broken

[Redex68]

Type: Bug

If there is a nested switch inside of another switch, collapsing the code doesn't work properly when we try to collapse a case from the encapsulating switch.

E.g.
Collapsing case 1 here doesn't properly collapse the code:

switch (a) {
    case 1:
    {
        switch (a){
            case 2:
                System.out.println("test1");
            case 3: 
                System.out.println("test2");
        }    
    }
    case 4:
    {
        System.out.println("test3");
    }
}

It collapses up untill the first occurance of a "case" keyword, regardles of which switch the case belongs to, instead of collapsing at the first occurance of a case keyword from the same switch.

Regular:

Failed collapse:

Expected behaviour:

Extension version: 1.11.0
VS Code version: Code 1.72.2 (d045a5eda657f4d7b676dedbfa7aab8207f8a075, 2022-10-12T22:15:18.074Z)
OS version: Windows_NT x64 10.0.22621
Modes:
Sandboxed: No

System Info

Item	Value
CPUs	AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics (16 x 3194)
GPU Status	2d_canvas: enabled canvas_oop_rasterization: disabled_off direct_rendering_display_compositor: disabled_off_ok gpu_compositing: enabled multiple_raster_threads: enabled_on opengl: enabled_on rasterization: enabled raw_draw: disabled_off_ok skia_renderer: enabled_on video_decode: enabled video_encode: enabled vulkan: disabled_off webgl: enabled webgl2: enabled webgpu: disabled_off
Load (avg)	undefined
Memory (System)	15.36GB (6.81GB free)
Process Argv	D:\Marin\FER\5. Semestar\Odabrana poglavlja razvoja programske potpore 1\Domaci Radovi\hw02-0036535607 --crash-reporter-id 36b72c21-ca7f-4ca2-94be-5592b850898e
Screen Reader	no
VM	0%

A/B Experiments

vsliv368cf:30146710
vsreu685:30147344
python383:30185418
vspor879:30202332
vspor708:30202333
vspor363:30204092
vslsvsres303:30308271
pythonvspyl392:30443607
vserr242cf:30382550
pythontb:30283811
vsjup518:30340749
pythonptprofiler:30281270
vshan820:30294714
vstes263:30335439
pythondataviewer:30285071
vscod805:30301674
binariesv615:30325510
bridge0708:30335490
bridge0723:30353136
cmake_vspar411:30581797
vsaa593:30376534
pythonvs932:30410667
cppdebug:30492333
vsclangdf:30486550
c4g48928:30535728
dsvsc012:30540252
azure-dev_surveyone:30548225
2144e591:30553903
vsccc:30566497
pyindex848:30577860
nodejswelcome1cf:30587006
fc301958:30573243

[jdneo]

Yes I can reproduce it