rgbasm.5 #300
Merged
rgbasm.5 #300
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
" can be used directly except in macro lines. Also in some situations wrapping with a Dq or Ql macro can be more appropriate.
The original list only existed because the documentation was split across multiple files. When all keywords are described in a single document, Ctrl+F suffices to find them.
|
Yeah, this is a much needed cleanup... Thanks. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Alternative to #299. I removed the list completely as it’s unnecessary when all directives are described in a single page. I’m not sure it makes sense to bring it back, but if it does get re‐added it should be structured like gbz80(7) which does allow linking to each entry.
This pull request also improves some of the semantic markup, fixes formatting errors, etc.