Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pyroma should not warn about license if the license is specified in classifiers #29

Closed
akitada opened this issue Aug 12, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@akitada
Copy link

akitada commented Aug 12, 2018

The license argument doesn’t have to indicate the license under which your package is being released, although you may optionally do so if you want. If you’re using a standard, well-known license, then your main indication can and should be via the classifiers argument. Classifiers exist for all major open-source licenses.
https://packaging.python.org/guides/distributing-packages-using-setuptools/#license

@regebro
Copy link
Owner

regebro commented Aug 15, 2018

Why not both?

@regebro regebro closed this as completed Aug 15, 2018
@drts01
Copy link

drts01 commented Feb 11, 2019

Why both? :)
If both are specified will pyroma make sure they are consistent?

In the PyPUG tutorials the license argument is also left out, https://packaging.python.org/tutorials/packaging-projects/#creating-setup-py.

I would like if pyroma checked how the PyPA has described. Maybe an config/flag to enforced both?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants