-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 317
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Auto-publish release feature #141
Comments
Oh gosh, then we’re going to have to rename it 😁 I think it’s worth a spike to see what it’d take to make it happen! And see how it affects the config, readme and code? |
Yes please! |
Always been quite interested in this, and have started work here: #304 |
Awesome idea!
It's been awhile since this issue was opened, in the meantime GitHub Actions has been released which makes it possible to execute logic after Release Drafter is done creating or updating a draft. The next release will include a fix for #326 which should make it possible to create this in a separate Action. If someone were to create such an Action, we'd be more than happy to promote it in the README :) |
Has the publish functionality been implemented? |
There is still work to do for auto release as we currently do not work on tags. Version-resolver and publish gets really close but can only be done on the |
Properly best off waiting for #546 it should allow any desired release workflow from GitHub action. |
Since #91 we've been able to get many of our repos using release drafter, with a nice Releases page and automatic patch version bumps. Thanks again for this tool!
One additional feature that we'd be really interested in contributing is automatic publication of releases. For many of our repos we typically want to release a new version after each PR is merged.
I thought of creating a separate probot to do this in the spirit of separation of concerns. However there is no hook for 'draft release created'; Release Drafter, as the creator of the draft release, is really in a unique position of being able to do this.
So I'd like to propose adding a feature that would:
I'd be keen to get your thoughts on this!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: