Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remo data analysis and comparison to observations #6

Open
larsbuntemeyer opened this issue Jun 14, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

remo data analysis and comparison to observations #6

larsbuntemeyer opened this issue Jun 14, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@larsbuntemeyer
Copy link
Contributor

larsbuntemeyer commented Jun 14, 2021

How to compare to gridded observations

How to handle masks?

  • How do we handle masks. Do we use the original REMO land sea mask before regridding? How to avoid regridding artifacts on the coastlines when REMO has no sea topography?

When to do the regridding?

  • Right now, we did the regridding before any further computation. Can the regridding be done in the end, e.g., on the the seasonal means?

Height correction

How does the heigh correction work correctly, e.g., what is height1 and height2 exactly? is my documentation here correct?

def height_correction(height1, height2):
    """Returns height correction in [K].

    Citation: trocken - adiabatischer Gradient, ludwig fragen.... link?

    Parameters
    ------------
  
    height1: array like
        topography of model data [m]
    height2: array like
        topography of *true* data [m], e.g., observations
  
    Returns
    --------

    height correction: array like
        temperature height correction due to different topographies
    """
    return (height2 - height1) * 0.0065

see ecmwf report page 11

@larsbuntemeyer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@KatharinaBuelow just to let you know about my questions here.

@larsbuntemeyer
Copy link
Contributor Author

larsbuntemeyer commented Jun 15, 2021

  • check soil spin upd on different regions, srex regions....
  • erst am ende remappen und höhenkorrektur am ende machen...
  • bei precipitation brauchen wir conservative remapping.
  • wir nutzen als gemeinsame maske die remo maske remapped auf die cru daten...
  • zusätzlich seasonal cycle vergleichen...
  • sst ansehen (code 54) in den forcing daten... keine missing values einlesen.
  • zusätlich mit EOBS Daten vergleichen....

@larsbuntemeyer
Copy link
Contributor Author

larsbuntemeyer commented Jun 15, 2021

we need bounds in remo output for conservative remapping, where do we get those?

@larsbuntemeyer larsbuntemeyer changed the title comparison to observations remo data analysis and comparison to observations Jun 16, 2021
@larsbuntemeyer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@larsbuntemeyer
Copy link
Contributor Author

ludwigs prototype: /pf/g/g300100/remo-dataset.ipynb

@ludwiglierhammer
Copy link
Contributor

Ich hab folgende Änderungen vorgenommen:

  • klimatologische Jahresgänge
  • Vergleich mit E-OBS und ERA5
  • Höhenkorrektur: (REMO - OBS) * 0.0065
  • Vergleiche: REMO - OBS (war vorher umgekehrt)
  • Reihenfolge: Mitteln, Remappen, Höhenkorrektur
  • REMO Landseemaske zum Maskieren

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants