You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My question is, as shown in the working example of tukey test, we could find the max value of p-value is 0.9, while I think it should be 1.0. Do you know the reason for it?
Or maybe I should ask, why is that the p-value got from psturng is from 0.001 to 0.9, but not 1.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a good question. The p values obtained by psturng are bound between 0.001 and 0.9 based on the degree of freedoms. If you get a p-value of 0.001, you should interpret it as <=0.001. As per the documentation, psturng uses scalar minimization to get the p values and they are bound between .001 and .9.
@reneshbedre Thanks for the reference for algorithm explanation of psturng! I get it, Gleason's table only have data between 0.1 and 0.999, so the p values we get are from .001 to .9.
It seems R's implementation of tukey test would reach 1.0, I'll take a look at that.
Thanks for the awesome work @reneshbedre !
My question is, as shown in the working example of tukey test, we could find the max value of p-value is 0.9, while I think it should be 1.0. Do you know the reason for it?
Or maybe I should ask, why is that the p-value got from
psturng
is from 0.001 to 0.9, but not 1.0The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: