New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: separate extractedConstraints from constraints #22823
Conversation
@zharinov is there a user guide for how to easily determine where coverage is missing? For example codecov does not seem help here: https://app.codecov.io/gh/renovatebot/renovate/pull/22823 |
I would like to find the way to upload HTML-based coverage reports somewhere. |
coverage issue again 😕 |
@zharinov can we get a simple yarn command to run all shards locally to find those coverage issues? |
I'm not sure it will help. I think what we need is to (1) reset codecov data, (2) re-run build on |
Most likely, detected coverage changes aren't in this PR's diff, but it must be in the files changed in this PR. |
🎉 This PR is included in version 35.124.4 🎉 The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Changes
Keeps
extractedConstraints
separate fromconstraints
during lookup phase so that the two can be distinguished during artifacts stage.Context
Fixes #22762
Documentation (please check one with an [x])
How I've tested my work (please select one)
I have verified these changes via: