-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: move docker images to node v12 #5548
Conversation
I can try to reduce the image size some more |
I'm also thinking of merging the build into one job to reuse build layers even more. se docker can save some build time becuse we share some build stages |
Any changes to base layer for openstack needed? |
I don't think so, I've left the user and group changes as is. Only moved them a bit. Maybe that's why the image size increase. |
|
Sorry, I didn't mean to start a full blown review, but apparently commenting from GitHub on Android does this 🤷 Can you add |
strange. shouldn't the following in base image do the |
Yeah, that would probably do it. I didn't realise that was in the base image 🤦 EDIT: Might also need |
Is there a way of knowing if it's actually installing recommends? |
Yes, we have to check the build logs. apt-get shows what should /recommend /will installled |
this forces node and yarn updates from base
4dd5a29
to
85cfa10
Compare
should we move the latest 3 commits to a new pr? |
|
🤔 |
fixed, node-gyp v5 tries to use python executable first, which is python2 on ubuntu. forced it to python3 now |
we need to something to make sure |
Could we add a |
putting it to tools, cause they already added to |
|
ready |
Tested it againt against https://github.com/viceice/renovate-test (dry-run). I would prefer to merge this back to v20 and finish v20 this week |
They are merged to new job |
OK so after merge I need to take them out of the required status checks? |
Changes
Image size (uncompressed)