Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

rerun::Image should support stride #6008

Open
rgolovanov opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

rerun::Image should support stride #6008

rgolovanov opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
🌊 C++ API C or C++ logging API enhancement New feature or request user-request This is a pressing issue for one of our users

Comments

@rgolovanov
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, when visualizing Image which has stride it is needed to copy aligned data to temporary storage and then log via rerun.
It would be good if rerun API would allow to specify stride.
@rgolovanov rgolovanov added enhancement New feature or request 👀 needs triage This issue needs to be triaged by the Rerun team labels Apr 17, 2024
@Wumpf
Copy link
Member

Wumpf commented Apr 17, 2024

Are you interested for this for C++ specifically or all apis?

For C++ there's some sketches here:

@Wumpf Wumpf added user-request This is a pressing issue for one of our users and removed 👀 needs triage This issue needs to be triaged by the Rerun team labels Apr 17, 2024
@rgolovanov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mainly for C++

@Wumpf Wumpf added the 🌊 C++ API C or C++ logging API label Apr 17, 2024
@Wumpf
Copy link
Member

Wumpf commented Apr 17, 2024 •
edited
Loading

phew, good then I already have a decent idea on how to go about it 😁 (see the linked ticket above)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🌊 C++ API C or C++ logging API enhancement New feature or request user-request This is a pressing issue for one of our users
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Wumpf @rgolovanov