Editorial submission

[rougier]

Title: ReScience (R)evolution
PDF URL: PDF
Metadata URL: Metadata
Suggested editor: @otizonaizit

Dear all,

This is a submission for an editorial that propose some change for the journal. The goal of the review is to know whether you're ok with the proposed changes or if you have comments or suggestions.

The actual review will take place on https://github.com/rescience-c/reviews once the editor (Tiziano) have opened the issue. Hopefully, this will be made automatically soon.

[danielskatz]

Note that "readint" in the PDF should be "reading".

Note that in this case, and in general under this model, if the source of the editorial was linked from the issue, I could have put in a PR to fix this, but since it's not and only the PDF and the metadata are available, it makes minor editing by a reviewer more complicated.

[otizonaizit]

Review has started here

[otizonaizit]

Note that "readint" in the PDF should be "reading".

Note that in this case, and in general under this model, if the source of the editorial was linked from the issue, I could have put in a PR to fix this, but since it's not and only the PDF and the metadata are available, it makes minor editing by a reviewer more complicated.

@danielskatz : We could add a link to the repo directly, yes. But otherwise, I don't think it's so much more complicated: reviewers can issue PRs on the authors repo, like @oliviaguest just did: rescience-c/template#1 , don't you think so?

[danielskatz]

Mostly, yes, but I still would prefer that the article source be directly linked from the review issue, rather than just inside the metadata. Maybe this is just me...

[rougier]

@danielskatz Could you bring your concerns into the review thread?

[danielskatz]

@danielskatz Could you bring your concerns into the review thread?

Done, in rescience-c/reviews#1 (comment)