Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 8, 2022. It is now read-only.

Residual isn't compatible on mac osx 10.5.8 (intel) #53

Closed
Harrypoppins opened this issue Apr 30, 2011 · 9 comments
Closed

Residual isn't compatible on mac osx 10.5.8 (intel) #53

Harrypoppins opened this issue Apr 30, 2011 · 9 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@Harrypoppins
Copy link

My computer :

  • OSx leopard 10.5.8 intel 2.13 Ghz
  • Xcode 3.1.3
  • SDL 1.2.14

Hi, it' impossible to launch Residual on my computer. Here is the bug report :

Process: residual [15104]
Path: /Applications/Residual.app/Contents/MacOS/residual
Identifier: org.residual
Version: ??? (???)
Code Type: X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process: launchd [1628]

Interval Since Last Report: 150128 sec
Crashes Since Last Report: 8
Per-App Interval Since Last Report: 0 sec
Per-App Crashes Since Last Report: 6

Date/Time: 2011-04-30 15:02:12.769 +0200
OS Version: Mac OS X 10.5.8 (9L31a)
Report Version: 6
Anonymous UUID: 20822E21-7B5E-4865-B572-A8572B387AB6

Exception Type: EXC_BREAKPOINT (SIGTRAP)
Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000002, 0x0000000000000000
Crashed Thread: 0

Dyld Error Message:
unknown required load command 0x80000022

@clone2727
Copy link
Contributor

I'm using 10.6.7 here and cannot reproduce the problem.

@aquadran
Copy link
Member

try delete config file, and try again
can you compile yourself ?

@Harrypoppins
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your interest !

So what config files you''re talking about ? If it's "Residual preferences" it never been created (in user/library/preferences) when i launch residual, it don't launch at all.

For the compiling, do you have some tutorial (with some picture could be nice, I'm not english) ? I never do this.

Thanks & good night !

@Harrypoppins
Copy link
Author

I've find an older version of Residual (with an old frontend of the interpretor : grimX)
This older version of Residual work on my mac ? It's strange, no ?

His conf file is : '.residualrc'

I think there's a problem of compatibility with the new version of Residual. (I hope in future Residual 'll work on Leopard)

@Harrypoppins
Copy link
Author

Someone could build a version for 10.5 please.
Thanks for your interest.

@somaen
Copy link
Member

somaen commented May 19, 2011

This stems from a known "issue" (or design decision rather) with the latest SDL-version, their 64-bit build uses 10.6-only stuff, which makes even Universal 64/32-binaries incompatible with 10.5 if run on a 64-bit system. Right now our only Mac-build is 64-bit.

As a side-note, from what I read on SDLs errata, if Residual is built on 10.5, or only built as 32-bit, then it should work on both. I propose chosing to build 32-bit intel/PPC-Universal Binaries, and dropping 64-bit, or at least keeping 64-bit separate whenever 32-bit/PCC becomes a daily build. (Although, actually, a PPC-binary would work on all 3 :P albeit with rosetta)

@Harrypoppins
Copy link
Author

Ok thanks for the info, this idea of sdl "only 10.6" is a shame for me (why ? commercial reasons ?), but I'm happy the user of 10.5 will have a compatible version of Residual (I hope soon).

@somaen
Copy link
Member

somaen commented May 19, 2011

Not really commercial reasons, just the fact that supporting 64-bit properly apparently wasnt possible without using 10.6-only stuff. This only applies to 64-bit SDL on mac though. (For their specific details regarding this, download SDL and have a look at the extra document in the dmg).

There is however nothing outside of the extra job of setting up the compilation, blocking the creation of a PPC/32-bit Intel Universal Binary now, but from what I understand, the compilation isn't done on a mac, so this is trickier than it sounds. I did however ask the guy having PPC-troubles in the forums to write up what he did, which should apply to you as well, If youre willing to compile yourself.

@somaen
Copy link
Member

somaen commented Jan 25, 2012

Now there's a PPC-build up, that should work through Rosetta for Intel-users on 10.5 for the moment, building a proper 10.5-Intel release won't be a priority for me any time soon. (As long as this works).

@somaen somaen closed this as completed Jan 25, 2012
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants