Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix rebuild-index for damaged index #3488

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 7, 2021

Conversation

MichaelEischer
Copy link
Member

@MichaelEischer MichaelEischer commented Aug 22, 2021

What does this PR change? What problem does it solve?

rebuild-index now ignores broken index files instead of failing with an error. This allows benefiting from the much faster incremental index rebuild, while still removing broken files.

Was the change previously discussed in an issue or on the forum?

No. But the problem was mentioned in #1229.

Checklist

  • I have read the contribution guidelines.
  • I have enabled maintainer edits.
  • I have added tests for all code changes.
  • [x] I have added documentation for relevant changes (in the manual).
  • There's a new file in changelog/unreleased/ that describes the changes for our users (see template).
  • I have run gofmt on the code in all commits.
  • All commit messages are formatted in the same style as the other commits in the repo.
  • I'm done! This pull request is ready for review.

@MichaelEischer MichaelEischer changed the title Rebuild broken index Fix rebuild-index for damaged index Aug 22, 2021
@juergenhoetzel
Copy link
Contributor

Works for me: Thanks! 👍

Copy link
Member

@fd0 fd0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@fd0 fd0 merged commit 8fe122d into restic:master Sep 7, 2021
@MichaelEischer MichaelEischer deleted the rebuild-broken-index branch September 7, 2021 19:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants