We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Basically a more efficient way for:
r.table("test").orderBy(r.asc("foo"), r.desc("bar")) r.table("test").orderBy(r.desc("foo"), r.asc("bar"))
Users can work around for numbers by saving the opposite in the index but they cannot do that for strings.
Tagging as RQL_proposal, and putting in backlog for now. Feel free to move it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
+1
Sorry, something went wrong.
Related: #3779
No branches or pull requests
Basically a more efficient way for:
Users can work around for numbers by saving the opposite in the index but they cannot do that for strings.
Tagging as RQL_proposal, and putting in backlog for now.
Feel free to move it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: