You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is related to issue rformassspectrometry/Spectra#135 . Would be nice to have an expandable database, e.g. pre-fill with MS2 spectra from a public repository and then (sequentially) add own spectra and annotations to it.
Where x is a CompDb and spectra a Spectra object. Note that the spectra also need to have a reference to the compound in the compound table - which might have to be added before.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A short question from my side: I have developed the MassBank backend, Steffen the Msp backend and maybe somebody else some other...
Shall at least the three/four/five of us agree on some common variable names, e.g. for InChIKey, SMILES, ID or so? Like this at least we don't have to map all the time between different preferences of variable naming. And maybe define a minimal set?
This is related to issue rformassspectrometry/Spectra#135 . Would be nice to have an expandable database, e.g. pre-fill with MS2 spectra from a public repository and then (sequentially) add own spectra and annotations to it.
Maybe best to add functions
Where
x
is aCompDb
andspectra
aSpectra
object. Note that thespectra
also need to have a reference to the compound in the compound table - which might have to be added before.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: