Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gain very bad #25

Closed
F4HZA opened this issue Jan 8, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed

Gain very bad #25

F4HZA opened this issue Jan 8, 2023 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working Test Test and validation phase
Milestone

Comments

@F4HZA
Copy link

F4HZA commented Jan 8, 2023

hello,

Thank you for this project, great work, I like the integration in the FT-991A.
I realized the S revision with the BRF193F, but I have a gain problem.
The gain is around -20db, I changed the BFR193F but the same.

I tested in the FT-991A but the attenuation is too high with IPO or AMP1 the signals are almost invisible with AMP2 I see the signals.

Do you have an idea of my problem? Is the new BFR193F transistor not suitable?

Thanks.
73.

@rfrht
Copy link
Owner

rfrht commented Jan 10, 2023

Hello @F4HZA o/

I have not tested the Revision S yet - this is the reason that I didn't promote it to the Main branch.

After consulting my digikey and JLCPCB orders, I found that I ordered the parts but never ordered the board - last known good revision is R.

When I get back to São Paulo (I'm in holidays here) I'll check my parts inventory and if all is sound, order a new board revision.

Side note, I found that this BFR193F is... tiny. Will be a pain to solder it; the 2SC5086 was already a challenge.

You might also want to check this reddit thread where I was suspecting that the BFR193F wasn't a suitable choice (spoiler alert: it seems it was the right choice).

Expect to have the Rev. S tested by mid March. Will keep this issue open for the time being.

@rfrht rfrht self-assigned this Jan 10, 2023
@rfrht rfrht added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 10, 2023
@rfrht rfrht added this to the Revision S milestone Jan 10, 2023
@rfrht rfrht added the Test Test and validation phase label Jan 10, 2023
@rfrht
Copy link
Owner

rfrht commented Nov 21, 2023

Hello there @F4HZA !

Stopping by to let you know that I ordered the parts and the board this weekend - and will probably have all the ducks lined for testing in January!

@F4HZA
Copy link
Author

F4HZA commented Nov 22, 2023

Good morning,
Sorry I moved on to another project, I made myself a panadaptor with an SPF5043Z and the basic schema.
No switch, the FT-991A automatically switches to ground, no filter. I am very happy with it.
I made a PCB with HF connectors, and placed it in the FT-911A since January 2023. I use an SDRPlay the gain is positioned at 1 in the SDR console program.
The important thing is to correctly configure the IF Output in External Radio, something capricious.

Thank you for your project which allowed me to install a panadaptor.

  1. F4HZA

@rfrht
Copy link
Owner

rfrht commented Nov 22, 2023

Hello, Frederic!
Thanks for sharing the SPF5043Z, I checked its datasheet - and the automatic bias control is definitely a relief.

I built a board design that allows for a SPF5043 for testing, will put that on my future tests. Thank you very much for sharing!

So- how's your board working? Do you have any pictures to share?

@F4HZA
Copy link
Author

F4HZA commented Nov 23, 2023

Hi,
I didn't take a photo of the mounted card, here is the image of the PCB.
image

I did it the old fashioned way, copper plate and iron perchloride. The components are quite large and soldering is easy.
I have attached the EAGLE project.
Panadapter EAGLE with SPF5043Z - F4HZA .zip
The card works perfectly, it was installed in January 2023 I have not reopened the FT-991A since. I use it with the SDRPLAY PRO2.

A point to review would be the 78L05 which heats up a little. Certainly also the adaptation of the values of the components I do not have the equipment to analyze. Make a professional PCB and resize it for good integration.
I had some problems correctly configuring the SDR CONSOLE software with the "External RADIO" and IF OUTPUT .
73. FAHZA.

@rfrht
Copy link
Owner

rfrht commented Feb 21, 2024

Hey there @F4HZA !

I finally built the test board, based on the experimental Revision S. Two major problems:

  1. The RF switch is flipped :-P It is disconnected by default - and this is the wrong logic. I have to fix that.
  2. I found more or less what you found. While the loss wasn't that much you found, it is a non-neglectible -7 dB.

I ran a VNA sweep from 10-1000 MHz and found that the board performs reasonably well around 200ish MHz - wich makes me believe that the BFR193 is under heavy impedance mismatch at ~ 70 MHz (the S21 Marker 1).

s21

I'll do some experiences here, and keep this issue open for the time being. I would like to thank you very much for the initial test and for reporting this issue!

rfrht added a commit that referenced this issue May 28, 2024
* Fixed a gross flaw in Revision S: The RF switch was flipped out /o\  Resolves #25
* Updated BOM, renamed some capacitors and the matching network components are labeled as {C,R}1x
* There are more gain to be obtained from BFR193. Added a bias and matching network design from [Infineon's AN-1806](https://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon-Design_Guide_for_low_noise_TR_in_FM_radio_FE-ApplicationNotes-v01_00-EN.pdf?fileId=8ac78c8c7e7124d1017f0227976a6c9d). While the matching network isn't suitable for BFR193, the footprints will be good enough to test other components and values. Capacitors are 0805, Resistors are 1206.
* This revision is planned to be a testbed for a proper bias and match network in order to get better gain figures from BFR193.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Freire <py2raf@rf3.org>
@rfrht
Copy link
Owner

rfrht commented May 28, 2024

Resolved by: a6511e5

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working Test Test and validation phase
Projects
None yet
Development

When branches are created from issues, their pull requests are automatically linked.

2 participants