Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add PEP8 compliance checking to 'check' target. #272

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 19, 2015

Conversation

dwlehman
Copy link
Contributor

@dwlehman dwlehman commented Nov 6, 2015

Moves 'pylint' to its own target, adds a 'pep8' target, and makes
the 'check' target empty with 'check' and 'pep8' as prerequisites.
This allows the user to run either pylint or pep8 separately or
together.

It also makes it possible to plumb a user-specified PYTHONPATH
into the 'pylint' target.

@dwlehman dwlehman added the master label Nov 6, 2015
@dwlehman dwlehman force-pushed the pep8-check branch 4 times, most recently from f5c0a92 to 758a08e Compare November 6, 2015 19:18
@jkonecny12
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me. It's nice to have pep8 testing.

@jkonecny12 jkonecny12 added the ACK label Nov 9, 2015
@vpodzime
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me otherwise.

Moves 'pylint' to its own target, adds a 'pep8' target, and makes
the 'check' target empty with 'check' and 'pep8' as prerequisites.
This allows the user to run either pylint or pep8 separately or
together.

It also makes it possible to plumb a user-specified PYTHONPATH
into the 'pylint' target.

We are currently ignoring errors for overly-long lines, hence the
'--ignore E501'.
dwlehman added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2015
Add PEP8 compliance checking to 'check' target.
@dwlehman dwlehman merged commit bad5213 into storaged-project:master Nov 19, 2015
@dwlehman dwlehman deleted the pep8-check branch November 19, 2015 21:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants