Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

still uncertain if osrm.profile = "walk" in osrmIsochrone works. #50

Closed
duleise opened this issue Sep 18, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

still uncertain if osrm.profile = "walk" in osrmIsochrone works. #50

duleise opened this issue Sep 18, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@duleise
Copy link

duleise commented Sep 18, 2019

hi, similar topic may be discussed before.
To be able to use osrm.profile = "walk", I rebuilt the osrm instance using foot.lua. I did this after I finished building the default car.lua instance, which worked fine.
However, when I tried to build the instance using foot.lua in a totally new environment, I got an error
[error] Input file "/data/sweden-latest.osrm.ebg" not found!
I noticed this .ebg file was created in the previous step if using car.lua, but not foot.lua.
So I used car.lua first and then foot.lua later. It looked like the instance was built okay, and I can set osrm.profile = "walk" in options. But the results of osrmIsochrone was not reassuring. I gave two extreme time intervals to compare.

iso <- osrmIsochrone(loc,
                     breaks = seq(from = 0, to = 120, by = 60),
                     res = 400, returnclass = "sf")

and the results, according to my eyes, were very much similar, if not identical.
I guess .ebg file is where the problem is. Could anybody give some suggestions?
Thanks a lot.

@rCarto
Copy link
Member

rCarto commented Sep 23, 2019

Hello,
The problem seems related to your OSRM build and not to the R package. I think you should check/post issues here : https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues

@rCarto rCarto closed this as completed Sep 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants