Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
248 lines (152 loc) · 6.38 KB

Readme.md

File metadata and controls

248 lines (152 loc) · 6.38 KB

should is an expressive, test framework agnostic, assertion library for node.

should literally extends node's assert module, in fact, it is node's assert module, for example should.equal(str, 'foo') will work, just as assert.equal(str, 'foo') would, and should.AssertionError is asset.AssertionError, meaning any test framework supporting this constructor will function properly with should.

Example

var user = {
    name: 'tj'
  , pets: ['tobi', 'loki', 'jane', 'bandit']
};

user.should.have.property('name', 'tj');
user.should.have.property('pets').with.lengthOf(4)

Installation

$ npm install should

modifiers

should's assertion chaining provides an expressive way to build up an assertion, along with dummy getters such as an, have, and be, provided are what I am simply calling modifiers, which have a meaning effect on the assertion. An example of this is the not getter, which negates the meaning, aka user.should.not.have.property('name'). In the previous example note the use of have, as we could omit it and still construct a valid assertion.

Some modifiers such as include only have an effect with specific assertion methods, for example when asserting a substring like so: str.should.include.string('test'), we could omit include, but it helps express the meaning, however keys has a strict effect, unless the include modifier is used.

chaining assertions

Some assertions can be chained, for example if a property is volatile we can first assert property existence:

user.should.have.property('pets').with.lengthOf(4)

which is essentially equivalent to below, however the property may not exist:

user.pets.should.have.lengthOf(4)

our dummy getters such as and also help express chaining:

user.should.be.a('object').and.have.property('name', 'tj')

ok

Assert truthfulness:

true.should.be.ok
'yay'.should.be.ok
(1).should.be.ok

or negated:

false.should.not.be.ok
''.should.not.be.ok
(0).should.not.be.ok

true

Assert === true:

true.should.be.true
'1'.should.not.be.true

false

Assert === false:

 false.should.be.false
 (0).should.not.be.false

arguments

Assert Arguments:

var args = (function(){ return arguments; })(1,2,3);
args.should.be.arguments;
[].should.not.be.arguments;

empty

Asserts that length is 0:

[].should.be.empty
''.should.be.empty
({ length: 0 }).should.be.empty

eql

equality:

({ foo: 'bar' }).should.eql({ foo: 'bar' })
[1,2,3].should.eql([1,2,3])

equal

strict equality:

should.strictEqual(undefined, value)
should.strictEqual(false, value)
(4).should.equal(4)
'test'.should.equal('test')
[1,2,3].should.not.equal([1,2,3])

within

Assert inclusive numeric range:

user.age.should.be.within(5, 50)

a

Assert typeof:

user.should.be.a('object')
'test'.should.be.a('string')

instanceof

Assert instanceof:

user.should.be.an.instanceof(User)
[].should.be.an.instanceof(Array)

above

Assert numeric value above the given value:

user.age.should.be.above(5)
user.age.should.not.be.above(100)

below

Assert numeric value below the given value:

user.age.should.be.below(100)
user.age.should.not.be.below(5)

match

Assert regexp match:

username.should.match(/^\w+$/)

length

Assert length property exists and has a value of the given number:

user.pets.should.have.length(5)
user.pets.should.have.a.lengthOf(5)

Aliases: lengthOf

string

Substring assertion:

'foobar'.should.include.string('foo')
'foobar'.should.include.string('bar')
'foobar'.should.not.include.string('baz')

property

Assert property exists and has optional value:

user.should.have.property('name')
user.should.have.property('age', 15)
user.should.not.have.property('rawr')
user.should.not.have.property('age', 0)

ownProperty

Assert own property (on the immediate object):

({ foo: 'bar' }).should.have.ownProperty('foo')

contain

Assert array value:

[1,2,3].should.contain(3)
[1,2,3].should.contain(2)
[1,2,3].should.not.contain(4)

keys

Assert own object keys, which must match exactly, and will fail if you omit a key or two:

var obj = { foo: 'bar', baz: 'raz' };
obj.should.have.keys('foo', 'bar');
obj.should.have.keys(['foo', 'bar']);

using the include modifier, we can check inclusion of a key, but not fail when we omit a few:

obj.should.include.keys('foo')
obj.should.include.keys('bar')
obj.should.not.include.keys('baz')

respondTo

Assert that the given property is a function:

user.should.respondTo('email')

Express example

For example you can use should with the Expresso TDD Framework by simply including it:

var lib = require('mylib')
  , should = require('should');

module.exports = {
  'test .version': function(){
    lib.version.should.match(/^\d+\.\d+\.\d+$/);
  }
};

Running tests

To run the tests for should simple update your git submodules and run:

$ make test

OMG IT EXTENDS OBJECT???!?!@

Yes, yes it does, with a single getter should, and no it wont break your code, because it does this properly with a non-enumerable property.

License

(The MIT License)

Copyright (c) 2010 TJ Holowaychuk <tj@vision-media.ca>

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the 'Software'), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED 'AS IS', WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.