You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, may I ask a question about the description in the paper?
As you mentioned in paper in the last paragraph of chapter 3.1:
"the stronger the data augmentation is, the smaller the N will be. The small neighboring region of a sample is a way to capture all near-duplicates and instances that can be obtained by data augmentation"
Shouldn't stronger data augmentation technique provide more samples of the same class(S) that makes the volume of them (N) larger?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @guantinglin, "Presumably, the stronger the data augmentation is, the smaller the N will be" is a hypothesis that not verified by experiments. The intuition is that the stronger the data augmentation is, the more near-duplicate samples can be augmented, therefore the total number of unique samples N would be smaller.
Hi, may I ask a question about the description in the paper?
As you mentioned in paper in the last paragraph of chapter 3.1:
"the stronger the data augmentation is, the smaller the N will be. The small neighboring region of a sample is a way to capture all near-duplicates and instances that can be obtained by data augmentation"
Shouldn't stronger data augmentation technique provide more samples of the same class(S) that makes the volume of them (N) larger?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: