We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
line no 154: copy.add( newComponent ); assumes that all components being cloned are referenced against their Class, not a BaseClass
copy.add( newComponent );
ie: copy.add( newComponent, ComponentBaseClass );
copy.add( newComponent, ComponentBaseClass );
I don't think that this method is used within the framework, so any errors probably won't occur very often.
I shall write a test to prove this, then write a patch
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
sorry, I hadn't realised that that the pull request would add an issue am closing this one
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
line no 154:
copy.add( newComponent );
assumes that all components being cloned are referenced against their Class, not a BaseClass
ie:
copy.add( newComponent, ComponentBaseClass );
I don't think that this method is used within the framework, so any errors probably won't occur very often.
I shall write a test to prove this, then write a patch
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: