Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make it possible to name Prop #90

Closed
rickynils opened this issue Feb 23, 2014 · 0 comments
Closed

Make it possible to name Prop #90

rickynils opened this issue Feb 23, 2014 · 0 comments

Comments

@rickynils
Copy link
Contributor

Make it possible to set a name of an individual Prop instance. The name should be stored in the Result instance. This way, the implementation of Properties could be simplified (turned into a Seq[Prop], with no special handling of property names), and Test.checkProperties could be turned into a simple map call.
@rickynils rickynils added this to the 1.12.0 milestone Feb 23, 2014
@rickynils rickynils mentioned this issue Feb 23, 2014
Closed
@rickynils rickynils self-assigned this Feb 23, 2014
@rickynils rickynils modified the milestones: 2.0.0, 1.12.0 Nov 24, 2014
@rickynils rickynils removed their assignment Nov 18, 2016
@larsrh larsrh removed this from the 2.0.0 milestone Apr 10, 2021
@larsrh larsrh closed this as completed Apr 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rickynils @larsrh