Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

balance score overhaul #51

Open
seth586 opened this issue Apr 29, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

balance score overhaul #51

seth586 opened this issue Apr 29, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@seth586
Copy link

seth586 commented Apr 29, 2020

Currently, a balance score of, say 1, can mean two things: either all the funds are on my side or on their side. Sorting channels by balance score is not currently useful or informative.

A balance score should illustrate balance in either direction.

A -1 to +1 score would illustrate balance in a specific direction.

-1 = all the balance is on my side

+1 = all the balance in on my peers side

0 = perfectly balanced

lndmanage uses this scoring system and it makes sense.

@saubyk
Copy link
Collaborator

saubyk commented May 17, 2020

Hi @seth586 there is one concern I have on your proposal.
With the balance score ranging from -1 to +1, you lose the ability to sort on your grids based on the balancedness of the channels. The current scoring mechanism, makes it easy to sort your most balanced channels easily.

@saubyk saubyk added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels May 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants