Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Port types? #22

Open
ajkeller34 opened this issue Oct 30, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Port types? #22

ajkeller34 opened this issue Oct 30, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ajkeller34
Copy link
Contributor

In discussing #11, Michael wrote:

After some thought, I agree that Cascade is not really necessary and given that things are generally more readable without it I'm in favor of making this change. I do like being able to specify what happens to the ports ahead of time though, as this would avoid some repeated code in the code for the paper. So if you have ideas for a better way to do that, that would be cool, though it's not that important.

To accomplish such functionality, it seems like a Port type would be necessary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant