Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bit field order in the fcf may be wrong #45

Closed
mmbabel opened this issue Jun 6, 2013 · 3 comments
Closed

bit field order in the fcf may be wrong #45

mmbabel opened this issue Jun 6, 2013 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Type: question The issue poses a question regarding usage of RIOT

Comments

@mmbabel
Copy link

mmbabel commented Jun 6, 2013

The changes in the fcf bit field order coming through #44 are may wrong.
it should be changed back if other 802.15.4 devices expect the former order.

@miri64
Copy link
Member

miri64 commented Feb 25, 2014

Fixed by #768

@miri64 miri64 closed this as completed Feb 25, 2014
@miri64
Copy link
Member

miri64 commented Feb 25, 2014

(but not for mc1322x, but is that at all supported fully, @OlegHahm and @thomaseichinger?)

@thomaseichinger
Copy link
Member

regarding the mc1322x radio driver in general: in doubt --> most probably no ;-)

But seriously, the mc1322x's MACA (MAC Accelerator) provides some sort of abstraction to 802.15.4 and thus does a lot internally which is nowhere documented in depth and it's a long time I worked on this so I'm sorry but I really can't tell without looking into it (which I won't find time for in the next days I think).

danpetry pushed a commit to danpetry/RIOT that referenced this issue Sep 7, 2018
eduazocar pushed a commit to eduazocar/RIOT that referenced this issue Jul 1, 2022
chrysn pushed a commit to chrysn-pull-requests/RIOT that referenced this issue Sep 16, 2022
sniffer: fix default baudrate in script
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: question The issue poses a question regarding usage of RIOT
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants