Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Sharp LS013B4DN04 memory display #61

Open
rm-hull opened this issue Dec 14, 2017 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #63
Open

Add support for Sharp LS013B4DN04 memory display #61

rm-hull opened this issue Dec 14, 2017 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #63

Comments

@rm-hull
Copy link
Owner

rm-hull commented Dec 14, 2017

Implementation Notes

image

image

Pinouts

LCD Pin LCD Name RPi Pin RPi Function Remarks
1 VIN P01-01 3V3 3.3V Power
2 3V3 P01-01 3V3 3.3V Power
3 GND P01-06 GND Ground
4 SCLK P0-23 GPIO 11 (SCLK) Serial Clock
5 MOSI P01-19 GPIO 10 (MOSI) Serial Data
6 CS P01-24 GPIO 8 (CE0) Chip Select
7 EXTMD P01-14 3V3 External mode (ON = external clock)
8 DISP P01-16 GPIO 23 Display ON/OFF signal
9 EXTIN P01-12 GPIO 18 (PWM0) PWM clock - external clock when EXTMD = ON
@rm-hull rm-hull changed the title Add support for Sharp memory display Add support for Sharp LS013B4DN04 memory display Jan 1, 2018
@rm-hull
Copy link
Owner Author

rm-hull commented Jan 2, 2018

References: http://www.makerdyne.com/blog/category/electronics/breakout-boards/

Well I have it working with some C code against my RPi-Zero from the above site:

image

Turns out it is 'not-quite' SPI in-as-much the chip select line is active high - normally CS is active low; not certain that the underlying py-spidev supports this, but at least it's some progress nonetheless.

cc: @Stefal

@rm-hull rm-hull linked a pull request Feb 4, 2018 that will close this issue
@CRImier
Copy link

CRImier commented Dec 16, 2023

I'm interested in adding support for Sharp Memory displays to luma.lcd, currently looking at the #63 code. Would such a contribution be interesting to upstream?

@thijstriemstra
Copy link
Collaborator

Would such a contribution be interesting to upstream?

I think so!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants