New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rng_seed appears to no effect in map2stan() #47
Comments
Yeah, this is a mysterious issue. The map2stan argument is Maybe something will occur to me. In the meantime, just use |
It might be the
The only differences are in the date, time, dso, and model_cpp. |
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016, Kevin Middleton notifications@github.com
|
Thanks. Sounds like an easy fix, with this information. Will try to roll it into the next push. |
This is fixed in experimental branch. |
Setting
rng_seed
does not appear to ensure repeatable analyses withmap2stan()
. For example, a simple model from Rethinking:Produce slightly different results.
all.equal(m1, m2)
show lots of differences, which seem to be fundamental rather than related to sampling (e.g., timing).:These differences are admittedly small, but my thinking is that the models should be identical except for timing differences (the case when using
seed =
is a purestan()
call).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: