-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Trigger when detection lost #1269
Comments
Hi @wong-kene 👋🏻 At present, there is no distinction between the situation when an object crosses the zone boundaries and simply disappears. We plan to add |
thanks for your response @SkalskiP |
@wong-kene, I guess the dataset is not the issue; the people are simply too small for the model to detect. As mentioned, you could detect them by increasing the model input resolution, but then your model would become slower. |
Hi @wong-kene 👋 The primary solution here is to increase the quality of small object detection. However, I'd still like to help. Here's some more info about small object detection with If that runs too slow, there's a hybrid solution you can try:
While the tracker IDs won't be compatible, you'll still know whether someone entered / left the problematic zone. Let me know if that solves your issue! |
Search before asking
Question
I use supervision for visitor counting inside specific area.
The whole system was running well except for one area only (let's call it area X).
The problem is the distance between camera and area X is too far, So that the person is so smaill. Engine still can detect the people but sometimes detection is lost for several second although the person is not move. and suddenly it be detected again
My question is.
Is any trigger when the people/object is :
if both trigger are exist, i will make a different treatment like this :
Or any solution to cover my problem?
thanks...
Additional
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: