Lack of a 'wip' branch

[ghost]

Not only would it be useful to commit changes to there rather than straight to master, it's also already covered in documentation (see CONTRIBUTING.md) but was apparently deleted? Regardless, it would definitely be a useful addition for development.

[roboyoshi]

Yes I deleted it, because I felt the exact opposite. Having a develop/wip branch is typical for software-dev (Classic Git Flow), but I don't see why it would be necessary here? When someone creates a PR and it's accepted, then it's pretty much approved and can be released to the public right away. So I changed it to master only. There are other branches for certain features, but I don't feel like changing it back.

[ghost]

Ah ok, fair enough. I can kind of see now why it wouldn't really be necessary. Thanks for explaining.