-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
Issues: dynaconf/dynaconf
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
[RFC] Deprecate init and write commands on 4.0.0
4.0-breaking-change
CLI
enhancement
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
#1163
opened Jul 12, 2024 by
rochacbruno
[RFC]Change the semantics of layered environments
4.0-breaking-change
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
[RFC] Remove the default DYNACONF_ envvar prefix and all loaders disabled by default
4.0-breaking-change
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
[RFC]Change how merge works on 4.0.0
4.0-breaking-change
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
[RFC] Improve Validator messages
4.0-breaking-change
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
typed_dynaconf
[RFC] Allow definition of loaders on Options class
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
typed_dynaconf
[RFC] Remove upperfy()
4.0-breaking-change
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
typed_dynaconf
[RFC] Support datetime and multiple str->datetime coercions
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
typed_dynaconf
[RFC]Implement Factory for lazy defaults
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
typed_dynaconf
[RFC] on Validator, replace cast with pre_validation
4.0-breaking-change
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
typed_dynaconf
[RFC] Implement option to coerce values on loading
4.0-breaking-change
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
typed_dynaconf
[RFC]Generate Schema from runtime Dynaconf Instance
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
typed_dynaconf
[RFC]typed: Generate Sample Config File from Schema
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
typed_dynaconf
[RFC] Add description text to the fields
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
typed_dynaconf
[RFC]typed: Add option to forbid/ignore extra values
Not a Bug
Not a Problem, expected behavior
RFC
typed_dynaconf
Previous Next
ProTip!
What’s not been updated in a month: updated:<2024-07-06.