We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It seems that requiring zero torque reference would be interpreted as no torque available and changes to position control. I know this requires a strong zero but I can see scenarios where we may want zero torque on specific joints. https://github.com/rohanpsingh/mc_mujoco/blob/7d1c7cbeb7a4fcd1d14f26a654fc1a274f0402f6/src/mj_sim.cpp#L767C6-L774C8
This looks like it is bug prone.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
It seems that requiring zero torque reference would be interpreted as no torque available and changes to position control. I know this requires a strong zero but I can see scenarios where we may want zero torque on specific joints.
https://github.com/rohanpsingh/mc_mujoco/blob/7d1c7cbeb7a4fcd1d14f26a654fc1a274f0402f6/src/mj_sim.cpp#L767C6-L774C8
This looks like it is bug prone.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: