Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Option to reassign bufferline.semantic_letters for alternate layouts #9

Closed
bearcatsandor opened this issue Oct 25, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@bearcatsandor
Copy link

I'm enjoying this plugin a lot. Thank you for developing it! However, in order to maintain my moral superiority over my colleges, I use the Colemak layout rather than qwerty. Would you be willing to add an option to set the key order of bufferline.semantic_letters for those of us using alternate layouts?

@romgrk romgrk closed this as completed in a402405 Oct 26, 2020
@romgrk
Copy link
Owner

romgrk commented Oct 26, 2020

Done, but be sure to define that option before barbar is loaded, it does some preprocessing to keep things fast (generates the index for each letter) so it needs the list upfront.

@bearcatsandor
Copy link
Author

Thank you! Forgive my ignorance, but vim doesn't load the config file top-down does it? How would one make sure that it's applied before it's loaded?

@romgrk
Copy link
Owner

romgrk commented Oct 26, 2020

Yes, you just need to define your plugin settings before loading the plugins. I think ^^ Well I've always done it like this: https://github.com/romgrk/nvim/blob/master/init.vim#L33-L49

@bearcatsandor
Copy link
Author

Thank you

@bearcatsandor
Copy link
Author

I really like what you've done with your config. Where would an appropriate place be to ask you about it?

@romgrk
Copy link
Owner

romgrk commented Oct 26, 2020

You can open issues on my config repo, I can answer questions there. I'm also sometimes on gitter.im/romgrk. But I check github more often.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants