Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

On sandboxes #59

Closed
maelle opened this issue Nov 23, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #74
Closed

On sandboxes #59

maelle opened this issue Nov 23, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #74
Assignees
@maelle

Comments

@maelle
Copy link
Member

maelle commented Nov 23, 2020

Related to #23 I think it's also important to encourage package developers consider creating a account specific to their package development. E.g. if you are wrapping Twitter API, create a new Twitter account.
@maelle
Copy link
Member Author

maelle commented Dec 8, 2020

This could be part of an advanced topic about contributor friendliness.

@maelle
Copy link
Member Author

maelle commented Dec 8, 2020

  • Having a sandbox
  • Describing exactly what's needed for running tests.

@maelle maelle pinned this issue Dec 8, 2020
@maelle maelle self-assigned this Dec 15, 2020
@maelle maelle mentioned this issue Dec 15, 2020
Merged
@maelle maelle unpinned this issue Dec 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@maelle maelle

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

contributor friendliness ropensci-books/http-testing
1 participant
@maelle