Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Go public #39

Closed
maurolepore opened this issue Mar 30, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Go public #39

maurolepore opened this issue Mar 30, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@maurolepore
Copy link
Member

@teixeirak and @gonzalezeb,

allodb is now public (following email thread). Here are the changes I made to adapt to this openess.

  • Added a few documents into .github/. This are fairly standard documents adapted from the tidyverse. For example, the document ISSUE_TEMPLATE is automatically used to guide users every time they open an new issue on GitHub.

  • Added some badges to reflect development status. The build status updates automatically every time we push a new commit to master branch.
    image

  • Tweaked the website a little bit -- more changes will come as I improve the template for all fgeo websites.

For you TODO

  • In .github/ please review and feel free to edit and remove documents as needed.
  • In DESCRIPTION please review authors and edit as needed.
  • In _pkgdown.yml please check if the link to "Learn more" is the one you want (now http://www.forestgeo.si.edu/).
  • Please review the labels in https://github.com/forestgeo/allodb/labels. Can I change these labels for more standard ones? They would look closer to these ones (both in name and colour):
    image
  • Close this issue when you are done.
@teixeirak
Copy link
Member

Thanks, Mauro.

The authors list is okay for now, with the understanding that it is just the start of a list, and not the final/ complete list.

I'm fine with you changing the labels however you consider appropriate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants