You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are about 30 records for species in the most recent BBS data release (via retriever) that aren't in raw_masses. This appears to me to be a mixture of subspecies conflicts, name changes, and a random 🦜
It's bugging me so I'm thinking to update raw_masses with those records. There might be a pathway via matching, or simply appending those rows to raw_masses and revisiting in excel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are about 30 records for species in the most recent BBS data release (via retriever) that aren't in
raw_masses
. This appears to me to be a mixture of subspecies conflicts, name changes, and a random 🦜It's bugging me so I'm thinking to update raw_masses with those records. There might be a pathway via matching, or simply appending those rows to raw_masses and revisiting in excel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: