Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better name for package #4

Closed
cboettig opened this issue Nov 6, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Better name for package #4

cboettig opened this issue Nov 6, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@cboettig
Copy link
Member

cboettig commented Nov 6, 2017

Original name: emljson

Consider:

  • emon: Ecological Metadata Object Notation (already taken on CRAN)
  • emlon: Ecological Metadata Language Object Notation
  • emonld Ecological Metadata Object Notation for Linked Data
  • emlildon ecological metadata language in linked data object notation
  • ...
@cboettig
Copy link
Member Author

Going with the name emld: Ecological Metadata as Linked Data, since I think it is more useful to emphasize the ld side than the json side of the serialization here. For instance, one of the most immediate use cases of the json-ld serialization of EML is to dump it all into RDF and then extract the desired components with SPARQL queries.

In general I think emld can play much more of a role on the consuming EML (and possibly in modifying existing EML) where the current EML package requires a lot of @@@@@ subsetting and knowing where a particular piece of data is buried. The RDF route is one way to abstract that structure away and permit more semantic statements. Less involved, just jsonld_flattening the EML first may also be useful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant