Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

strange error on unbuntu-20.04 (devel) #45

Open
rafapereirabr opened this issue Nov 25, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

strange error on unbuntu-20.04 (devel) #45

rafapereirabr opened this issue Nov 25, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@rafapereirabr
Copy link

Hi all. Thanks for developig the {parzer} package. It is super handy! I used it as a dependency in my {flightsbr} package. The problem is that I've recently noticed this strange error with {parzer} in my cmd-cheks using unbuntu-20.04 (devel). Plase see the error message below, or the full log of cmd checks here. I'm not sure what could be causing this , specially because this error does not occur on any other server, and I cannot reproduce the error on my local machine. I've included below a reproducible code that is very similar to the code throwing that error.

Error message:

> 
> Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
> Last 13 lines of output:
>   Backtrace:
>       ▆
>    1. └─flightsbr::read_airports() at test_read_airports.R:12:4
>    2.   └─flightsbr:::latlon_to_numeric(dt_private)
>    3.     ├─df[, `:=`(latitude, parzer::parse_lat(latitude))]
>    4.     └─data.table:::`[.data.table`(df, , `:=`(latitude, parzer::parse_lat(latitude)))
>    5.       └─base::eval(jsub, SDenv, parent.frame())
>    6.         └─base::eval(jsub, SDenv, parent.frame())
>    7.           └─parzer::parse_lat(latitude)
>    8.             └─parzer:::scrub(lat)
>    9.               └─base::gsub("[^A-Za-z0-9\\.\\ ,'-]|d|g", "'", x)
>   
>   [ FAIL 1 | WARN 14 | SKIP 0 | PASS 73 ]
>   Error: Test failures
> 

Reproducible example

library(parzer)
library(data.table)
library(flightsbr)

# download and read data
url <- 'https://www.gov.br/anac/pt-br/assuntos/regulados/aerodromos/cadastro-de-aerodromos/aerodromos-cadastrados/cadastro-de-aerodromos-civis-publicos.csv'

dt <- fread(url, skip = 1,
            encoding = 'UTF-8',
            colClasses = 'character')

# fix column names to lower case
pbl_names <- unlist(c(dt[1,]))
pbl_names <- iconv(pbl_names, from = 'utf8', to = 'utf8')
data.table::setnames(dt, tolower(pbl_names) )
dt <- dt[-1,]

# check column values to parse
dt$latitude[1]
#> "8° 20' 55'' S"


# convert to numeric
dt[, latitude := parzer::parse_lat(latitude) ]
dt[, longitude := parzer::parse_lon(longitude) ]

dt$latitude[1]
#> -8.348611

Session Info
> sessionInfo()
R version 4.1.1 (2021-08-10)
Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)
Running under: Windows 10 x64 (build 22000)

Matrix products: default

locale:
[1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252 
[2] LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252   
[3] LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252
[4] LC_NUMERIC=C                          
[5] LC_TIME=English_United States.1252    

attached base packages:
[1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base     

other attached packages:
[1] data.table_1.14.6 parzer_0.4.1      flightsbr_0.2.0  

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
 [1] Rcpp_1.0.9      withr_2.5.0     brio_1.1.3      R6_2.5.1       
 [5] lifecycle_1.0.3 magrittr_2.0.3  httr_1.4.4      rlang_1.0.6    
 [9] cli_3.4.1       curl_4.3.3      rstudioapi_0.14 testthat_3.1.5 
[13] xml2_1.3.3      tools_4.1.1     glue_1.6.2      compiler_4.1.1 
[17] rvest_1.0.3  
@github-actions
Copy link

#Thanks! \nWe will look into it ASAP.

@mpadge
Copy link
Member

mpadge commented Nov 28, 2022

Thanks @rafapereirabr. Note that @AlbanSagouis has recently taken over maintenance of this package, and he and i are rewriting and improving a lot of the C++ code in #44. The problem is that that is on a branch in his own GitHub profile. I think you could still replace standard install on GitHub actions with Alban's version via remotes: AlbanSagouis/parzer@cpp11-optimisation, but ... the branch is currently failing anyway, so that's clearly not going to help.

@AlbanSagouis maybe this is the kind of kick we need to get us moving on merging your long-standing PR? @rafapereirabr Can you bear with us for a bit while we expedite the re-write? Hopefully 😄

@rafapereirabr
Copy link
Author

Hi @mpadge, thanks for the reply ! No worries, this is not an urgent matter on my side but I'm glad to hear you've been cooking this major improvment to the package (which is already great, tbh)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants