Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data download via DOI from data repository #37

Closed
nuest opened this issue Feb 25, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Data download via DOI from data repository #37

nuest opened this issue Feb 25, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@nuest
Copy link
Contributor

nuest commented Feb 25, 2019

For future references (and to add some search terms) and to discuss the scope of this package: This package is specifically for downloading data based on an article's DOI, not for DOIs given to a dataset itself.

Data should be published in data repositories such as Zenodo, Figshare, b2share, ... see re3data.org for a long list. Other packages should/could handle that, see e.g. https://github.com/ropenscilabs/doidata (concept only so far).

@willpearse What is your take on this? I initiatlly thought "maybe we should add support for Zenodo to this package?" and then recalled the doidata idea.

@nuest nuest changed the title Data download via DOI Data download via DOI from data repository Feb 25, 2019
@willpearse
Copy link
Collaborator

I have three grants due at the end of this week, so forgive me if I'm a little terse below! :p

We support Figshare already, and I think I was asked to pull suppdata out of fulltext after Noam defined the doidata intention. @noamross should probably chime in, but I don't really see why (given we've already started doing some of this) we couldn't continue and prioritise adding in things like Zenodo at our upcoming hack-a-thon. What do you think, Noam?

@willpearse
Copy link
Collaborator

Because we haven't heard back from this, I'm going to assume that my answer (that we already, to some extent, do this in this package, and that we should continue to do so) is sufficient. Marking as closed, but happy to re-open if someone disagrees or if this crops up again in conversation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants