You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is probably not an issue, but rather a suggestion and an invitation to discussion.
ImageMagick installation on Windows may be ... a little involved. Is there a reason you want to keep dependency on magick in tesseract? You only seem to use magick for saving magick images, so if you save them using other tools, you are afraid of losing class (do you even need to save them, as argued in #28)? I imagine that removing dependency on magick will help wider adoption of tesseract, particularly by folks to tend to use imager and other R image processing platforms
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I apologize for asking. You are right that magick is self-contained. I would love to hear your view on #28 re: TMP images. Thank you again and sorry for my lack of diligence.
This is probably not an issue, but rather a suggestion and an invitation to discussion.
ImageMagick installation on Windows may be ... a little involved. Is there a reason you want to keep dependency on
magick
intesseract
? You only seem to usemagick
for savingmagick
images, so if you save them using other tools, you are afraid of losing class (do you even need to save them, as argued in #28)? I imagine that removing dependency on magick will help wider adoption oftesseract
, particularly by folks to tend to useimager
and other R image processing platformsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: