Interview Series: Demystifying the Creative/Development Process of the R Community #64
Comments
I'd love to be part of this! |
Reminds me a bit of usethis style posts, but somewhat different in focus. |
Thank you for posting this @kellobri! Great example questions. @jennybc I told @kellobri about how much you loved talking to @jimhester about his git workflow and the idea of rOpenSci hosting some "how I work" posts. Here are some other example posts I collected fyi
|
Wonderful idea, I'd also love to be a part of this! |
An additional "Bonus Question" suggestion (I like all of what you have above!). Would need to be refined but something along the lines of: |
This sounds awesome!! In reading it, I was reminded of this blog about routines. While not exactly related to working styles, it is fun and relatable to learn what gets people going each day :) |
Would be happy to be part of this. I think one potential set of questions is to ask how people work on a team: How do you collaborate with others? What tools do you use for collaboration and communication? How do you deal with different levels of knowledge and different workflows? How do you learn from each other? |
I would goshdarn love this. Happy to be interviewer, interviewee, transcriber, whatever |
Would make a great blog post about how people did this at the unconf, if someone was interested in this topic. |
This is a great idea! I just spoke with @stefaniebutland about recording video during the unconf, and she mentioned this side project and the possibility of getting videos of the interviews as well to edit and put together. Would anyone be open to it? |
Hi @kellobri, I love this idea!! Listening to people's stories and getting a sense of the friendly people behind the code has been huge for me as I've been becoming a data scientist. If you're interested, I'd be happy to be interviewed too. I was pretty intimidated when I started learning to code but I overcame that and we've built a whole ocean program with these tools and are teaching other environmental scientists all over the world :) |
@kellobri I wonder if there is value in pairing some people up as interviewers and interviewees before the unconf in order to save some face-to-face time. Truly wondering, not being passive aggressive 😉 . Some people might be dying to talk with/interview a specific person so they could declare it here and the group might decide on a set of questions that interviewers could use or a limited pool they could select from. (Of course, also good/important to have this open to others to join in at unconf) @kellobri You're under no obligation to take this on to organize (you might also want to write some code, or not) but you get first dibs since it was your initiative. I'm happy to help in any way. I'd love to post interviews on the rOpenSci blog every 2 months x 6 for example and tweet about them to our nearly 13,000 followers! In thinking about interviewees, beyond just the perceived experts, in our community there is a heap of value in highlighting and implicitly promoting diversity of all types - sectors of work like gov't, industry, academia, non-profit; different genders, underrepresented minorities, people who quietly produce awesome things without drawing attention to themselves, people who act as reviewers for software onboarding, ... btw, I love this interview question: |
@stefaniebutland I love all these ideas. I wonder if we could strategize a way to connect people who are interested in interviewing with people who wouldn't mind being interviewed in a way that wouldn't be super forced or uncomfortable. There are probably people who wouldn't mind being interviewed (even twice!) but there are also people who probably would prefer to pass for now. I'd like to see lots of different types of interviewees, like you mentioned, especially people who wouldn't necessarily be immediately forthcoming in a self-nominating situation. But I also don't want anyone to feel pressured into do this because someone else nominated them. @stefaniebutland If you have some time tomorrow or next week to chat or slack about an organizational strategy, I'd really like that. And if anyone has ideas re: the humane sourcing of interviewee candidates, please share! |
Last week @kellobri and I talked about how we might facilitate this, given that so many people are interested. At the unconf, we'll probably put up several pieces of paper on the wall:
@kellobri agreed to assemble a draft set of core questions to ask (esp if we are to turn some interviews into a series of rOpenSci blog posts about people's workflows or career paths), plus a list of optional questions to help people get started. |
Summary Post Many people seem interested in participating as interviewers, interviewees, or both! @stefaniebutland is going to help us put together some lists and schedules on the first morning. Interviewee Volunteers List (Hopefully we’ll continue to add) Interview Format Basic Stats |
If I could ask any question of these interviewees, I'd want to know their story: how did you get where you are now? Both the path they took, and their commentary on it. I think readers of these interviews would be interested in seeing the variety of routes people have taken, and the advice (implicit or explicit) contained in commentary re: what parts were the most valuable, difficult, etc. |
Concrete outcome from this! Thank you @kellobri ! New rOpenSci monthly blog series called ".rprofile". First post is interview with David Smith https://ropensci.org/blog/2017/10/13/rprofile-david-smith/ |
Would this be cool? (Side Project)
I'm interested in perhaps conducting a series of interviews which could then be turned into a series of rOpenSci blogs. I love listening to podcasts where people are interviewed about their creative/working/training process. I've never interviewed people before, so it might all go terribly wrong, but I'm hoping this could be a cool experiment to attempt during the unconference.
Thanks to @stefaniebutland for the encouragement and for suggesting that @jennybc might be interested??
Please let me know...
Interview Question Ideas
Basic Stats:
If you have a “typical” work day:
Which parts of your workflow are standard across most projects, which parts tend to change:
Bonus Questions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: