You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for this project. Tremendously helpful. This is not an issue with the project but more a question about how to interpret data in the SNOMED model. I loaded the S Edition of SNOMED CT(R): March 2017 Release into the schema on PostgreSQL. In the curr_simplemaprefset_f table I have some examples where the same mapping is present with active=0 in one row and active=1 in another row. With different values in the effectivetime column. For example:
id
effectivetime
active
moduleid
refsetid
referencedcomponentid
maptarget
53be7b87-2f7f-5626-a10c-0221bca098f1
20020731
1
900000000000207008
446608001
275990002
C66.9
53be7b87-2f7f-5626-a10c-0221bca098f1
20080131
0
900000000000207008
446608001
275990002
C66.9
Does this mean that this mapping was active beginning "20020731" but then became inactive "20080131"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks!
Yes, that's the correct interpretation. The SNOMED CT component with the most recent effective time is the relevant one which represents the current state of the component.
Thanks for this project. Tremendously helpful. This is not an issue with the project but more a question about how to interpret data in the SNOMED model. I loaded the S Edition of SNOMED CT(R): March 2017 Release into the schema on PostgreSQL. In the curr_simplemaprefset_f table I have some examples where the same mapping is present with active=0 in one row and active=1 in another row. With different values in the effectivetime column. For example:
Does this mean that this mapping was active beginning "20020731" but then became inactive "20080131"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: