Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RandomForest Classifier results #5

Open
Mirmix opened this issue Dec 19, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

RandomForest Classifier results #5

Mirmix opened this issue Dec 19, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@Mirmix
Copy link

Mirmix commented Dec 19, 2019

Thanks for making this work open-source.
I have tried to replicate your results using Taiwanese datasets.
I have generated images with dimension size of 50 and a period size of 20.
I have done testing with a random forest classifier.
I have tried a different number of estimators to check the improvement of the result.
I get accuracy around 0.55 with the shared Taiwanese dataset.
I would like to know whether you have a guess about what I could be missing?
I would like to know also why there is such a big gap between my results using the exact same pipeline and the results mentioned in the paper.

@nkchem09
Copy link

Thanks for making this work open-source.
I have tried to replicate your results using Taiwanese datasets.
I have generated images with dimension size of 50 and a period size of 20.
I have done testing with a random forest classifier.
I have tried a different number of estimators to check the improvement of the result.
I get accuracy around 0.55 with the shared Taiwanese dataset.
I would like to know whether you have a guess about what I could be missing?
I would like to know also why there is such a big gap between my results using the exact same pipeline and the results mentioned in the paper.

Hi, I got a problem just the same.
The accuracy result calculated by deepCNN is also aound 0.55. Do you got the key to increase the accuracy result?
Thank you very much.

@yc-wang00
Copy link

Thanks for making this work open-source.
I've tried different models on the dataset but the accuracy is just overfitting by choosing all up/down. I would like to know whether you have a guess about what I could be missing?

@yc-wang00
Copy link

Thanks for making this work open-source. I have tried to replicate your results using Taiwanese datasets. I have generated images with dimension size of 50 and a period size of 20. I have done testing with a random forest classifier. I have tried a different number of estimators to check the improvement of the result. I get accuracy around 0.55 with the shared Taiwanese dataset. I would like to know whether you have a guess about what I could be missing? I would like to know also why there is such a big gap between my results using the exact same pipeline and the results mentioned in the paper.

I got the same issue here. Have you resolved the issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants