You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just wanted to confirm if I need to change anything before running DRAC (Random Conv) to reproduce the results reported in Table 4 and 5 in the paper -- also, why is Rand + FM (9.16) bolded instead of IBAC-SNI (9.46) for results on CoinRun in Table 5?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You don't need to change anything, you can just run python train.py --env_name coinrun --aug_type crop to reproduce those results. Re Table 5, you are right, that must be a mistake, IBAC-SNI is better than Rand-FM. Thanks for catching this, it will be fixed in the updated draft.
I just wanted to confirm if I need to change anything before running DRAC (Random Conv) to reproduce the results reported in Table 4 and 5 in the paper -- also, why is Rand + FM (9.16) bolded instead of IBAC-SNI (9.46) for results on CoinRun in Table 5?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: