Clarify that all command arguments need to be present

[otterdahl]

No description provided.

[marcgarba]

Instead of a restrictive "All arguments needs to included in a command, otherwise it results a serious
error resulting in MessageNotAck.", it could be written : "All required arguments for a command needs to be included..."
It would allow the possibility to have some optional arguments in a command.

[otterdahl]

Instead of a restrictive "All arguments needs to included in a command, otherwise it results a serious error resulting in MessageNotAck.", it could be written : "All required arguments for a command needs to be included..." It would allow the possibility to have some optional arguments in a command.

Good idea. However, right now we're assuming that all arguments are present. Otherwise we might end up with an undefined behaviour of how the TLC is expected to act. But I can certainly agree about there being arguments in some command that can be considered optional, but they need to be defined in the SXL.

We've opened up a separate issue about optional arguments in commands. #148

[otterdahl]

I'm merging this and closing this issue.