You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 9, 2024. It is now read-only.
I feel like ggvis would really benefit from supporting interactive pan and zooming ala gadfly.
Do you currently have any plans to support these types of simple interactions with ggvis, I have not seen any of this functionality in the current demos.
I would be happy to do submit on a pull request if you think it is feasable to do with vega (it does not look like it is implemented in vega currently https://github.com/trifacta/vega/issues/168).
Also I really like the new syntax, being able to use %>% in both dplyr and ggvis makes for a very nice workflow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's definitely something we want to add. I think changing the domain of vega scales would be the most natural way to do this, but they're currently static and can't be updated easily (or at least don't have a good exposed API). If you have ideas on how to implement, we'd love to hear them.
It is possible now to zoom and pan - if you show the zoomed and panned results in a second plot.
Before you dig to deep into the code, please bear in mind that there are major changes coming - we've been working on the new-syntax branch, which has big changes to the API, as well as a much simpler way of creating interactive components.
I feel like ggvis would really benefit from supporting interactive pan and zooming ala gadfly.
Do you currently have any plans to support these types of simple interactions with ggvis, I have not seen any of this functionality in the current demos.
I would be happy to do submit on a pull request if you think it is feasable to do with vega (it does not look like it is implemented in vega currently https://github.com/trifacta/vega/issues/168).
Also I really like the new syntax, being able to use
%>%
in both dplyr and ggvis makes for a very nice workflow.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: