Fix for gt_group objects printing through knitr/Quarto
#1332
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR provides a working implementation of printing for a
gt_groupobject (created viagt_split()). This wasn't working in Quarto because theknit_printmethod was incomplete/untested (though the print method was fine). The fix here borrows from theprintmethod; the extra<br />was removed because it seems to provide too much space (and there should be a future option for the table separator anyway).The issue of having a duplicate ID values (if a fixed value was given to the pre-split table) still persists. This will be solved in a later PR that should better handle table option values.
Fixes: #1286