Apache or LGPL?

[sethhall]

Why is the Apache license (COPYING.ASL20) included with liblognorm? It seems like most (all?) of the actual source files have LGPL license information in them.

[davidelang]

Rsyslog is looking to transition from gpl to apache David Lang

[sethhall]

Awesome! Two follow up questions.

• How is the transition progressing? I assume that the source code is not fully under Apache 2.0 yet?
• Does this mean that libestr will be relicensed as Apache 2.0 too? It's LGPL right now.

[rgerhards]

El dom., 1 sept. 2019 a las 18:29, Seth Hall (<notifications@github.com>) escribió:

Awesome! Two follow up questions. How is the transition progressing? I assume that the source code is not fully under Apache 2.0 yet?

Assumption is right. Transition is a slow process because it is low priority and there also is no sponsor for that activity.

Does this mean that libestr will be relicensed as Apache 2.0 too? It's LGPL right now.

Either this or be replaced (it's really slim). HTH Rainer

…

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.