-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A question for strength estimation #1
Comments
No, it's not that simple, I guess Section 3.1 will explain it for you: If you are interested in the overall topic, I suggest to read: https://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2014/papers/AStudyofProbabilisticPasswordModels.pdf https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity16/sec16_paper_melicher.pdf |
Thanks, I'll read the paper soon. I just read Section 3.1 and from its description, P(x) can be defined as a joint probability distribution which used to be employed as a good representative for password strength, an atomic interpretation of course. So does "1.1231321e-11" mean P(123456) = 1.1231321e-11 ? Does it work like this in your repo? |
This really depends on your settings. See Line 67 and below in meter.py Simplified it's IP(1) * CP(2) * CP(3) * CP(4) * CP(5) * EP(6). Why not use their code? |
Oh I see. I'll check whether it is the solution I am looking for. Your guidance is really helpful for new guys in password security like me. Thank you once again and wish you a great day! |
Hello, I wonder if the result of password strength estimation can be considered as the probability of the password?
For instance, in "1.1231321e-11 123456", the probability of password "123456" is "1.1231321e-11"?
Looking forward to your reply!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: