Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

About the evaluation metric dist@K #67

Closed
user-AC opened this issue Feb 19, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

About the evaluation metric dist@K #67

user-AC opened this issue Feb 19, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@user-AC
Copy link

user-AC commented Feb 19, 2023

Thanks for your amazing project！

I noticed that the dist@k obtained by using crslab is much larger than the dist@k reported in the original paper, such as kgsf, what is the reason?

Looking forward to your reply.
@wxl1999
Copy link
Member

wxl1999 commented Feb 19, 2023

I do not find the reason either. If you have any idea, you can tell me and raise a PR!

@user-AC
Copy link
Author

user-AC commented Feb 19, 2023

ok, thanks!

@user-AC user-AC closed this as completed Feb 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@wxl1999 @user-AC