Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Job's referenced from via JobRef don't have their statistic's updated #176

Closed
gschueler opened this issue Jun 23, 2012 · 2 comments · May be fixed by carlosrfranco/rundeck#5
Closed

Job's referenced from via JobRef don't have their statistic's updated #176

gschueler opened this issue Jun 23, 2012 · 2 comments · May be fixed by carlosrfranco/rundeck#5
Labels

Comments

@gschueler
Copy link
Member

When a job is referenced via a jobref, the statistics are not updated when they run by a parent.

original LH ticket

Original Creator: Noah Campbell

@gschueler
Copy link
Member Author

(by Greg Schueler at 2010-11-18T15:51:27-08:00)

deferring for future release..

from irclog:

gschueler

3:42 well the problem is that when you run a jobref, it doesn't really run the job..it just runs the workflow for the job

3:43 i.e. there is no "Execution" associated with that job

noahcampbell

3:43 We can bump this out to a later revision

3:44 I just noticed that a particular job of significance was being called many many times through a jobref and there were no job stats. This makes it look like it's not being used

gschueler

3:45 ok…i think we'd either have to modify Execution to allow some kind of chained Execution (which has no output file of its own), or update the way stats are calculated so that the successrate is stored in the ScheduledExecution

3:45 right now it just queries for number of successful Executions

@ghost ghost assigned gschueler Jun 23, 2012
@siliconcow
Copy link

+1 This would be really helpful to us. We have long workflows and we can't tell what step they're at, how often each step is failing, which step is making the entire workflow take longer, etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants