Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update rust-analyzer to use windows-sys crate #17168

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2024

Conversation

kennykerr
Copy link
Contributor

I noticed that the rust-analyzer project already depends on windows-sys. This update merely replaces the remaining direct dependencies on the older winapi crate with windows-sys dependencies.

Originally posted here: rust-lang/rust#124578

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 1, 2024
@@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ dependencies = [
"perf-event",
"tikv-jemalloc-ctl",
"tracing",
"winapi",
"windows-sys 0.52.0",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is fine, it doesn't introduce a new version of the crate.

@lnicola
Copy link
Member

lnicola commented May 1, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 1, 2024

📌 Commit 99e2530 has been approved by lnicola

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@lnicola
Copy link
Member

lnicola commented May 1, 2024

And thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 1, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 99e2530 with merge cfce2bb...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 1, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: lnicola
Pushing cfce2bb to master...

@bors bors merged commit cfce2bb into rust-lang:master May 1, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants